Separation results for the size of constant-depth propositional proofs
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper proves exponential separations between depth d -LK and depth (d + 1 2 )-LK for every d ∈ 1 2 N utilizing the order induction principle. As a consequence, we obtain an exponential separation between depth d -LK and depth (d+1)-LK for d ∈ N . We investigate the relationship between the sequence-size, tree-size and height of depth d -LK-derivations for d ∈ 1 2 N , and describe transformations between them. We define a general method to lift principles requiring exponential tree-size (d + 1 2 )-LK-refutations for d ∈ N to principles requiring exponential sequence-size d -LK-refutations, which will be described for the Ramsey principle and d = 0. From this we also deduce width lower bounds for resolution refutations of the Ramsey principle. Constant-depth propositional proof systems have been extensively studied because of their connection with the complexity of constant-depth circuits and fragments of bounded arithmetic (c.f. [2, 9, 13, 14, 17]). Kraj́ıček [9] defined an alternative notion of constant-depth proofs: a formula is defined to have Σ-depth d iff if is depth d+1 and the bottommost level of connectives have fanin ≤ logS , where S is a size parameter. A proof is defined to have Σ-depth d provided every formula in the proof has Σ-depth d where S is the size of the proof. Partially supported by a Marie Curie Individual Fellowship #HPMF-CT-2000-00803 from the European Commission, and by FWF-grants #P16264-N05 and #P16539-N04 of the Austrian Science Fund. Institute of Algebra and Computational Mathematics, Vienna University of Technology, A-1040 Vienna, Austria. Email: [email protected] Supported in part by NSF grant DMS-0100589. Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0112. Email: [email protected].
منابع مشابه
On Transformations of Constant Depth Propositional Proofs
This paper studies the complexity of constant depth propositional proofs in the cedent and sequent calculus. We discuss the relationships between the size of tree-like proofs, the size of dag-like proofs, and the heights of proofs. The main result is to correct a proof construction in an earlier paper about transformations from proofs with polylogarithmic height and constantly many formulas per...
متن کاملEquational calculi and constant depth propositional proofs
We deene equational calculi for proving equations between functions in the complexity classes ACC(2) and TC 0 , and we show that proofs in these calculi can be simulated by polynomial size, constant depth proofs in Frege systems with counting modulo 2 and threshold connectives respectively.
متن کاملTel Aviv University the Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences School of Computer Science Studies in Algebraic and Propositional Proof Complexity
The field of proof complexity aims at characterizing which statements have short proofs in a given formal proof system. This thesis is a contribution to proof complexity broadly construed as the field that studies the sizes of structured or symbolic proofs. Our focus will be on the development and complexity-theoretic study of new frameworks, mainly of an algebraic nature, for providing, among ...
متن کاملResolution Proofs of Generalized Pigeonhole Principles
We extend results of A. Haken to give an exponential lower bound on the size of resolution proofs for propositional formulas encoding a generalized pigeonhole principle. These propositional formulas express the fact that there is no one-one mapping from c ·n objects to n objects when c > 1. As a corollary, resolution proof systems do not p -simulate constant formula depth Frege proof systems.
متن کاملBounded Arithmetic and Constant Depth Frege Proofs
We discuss the Paris-Wilkie translation from bounded arithmetic proofs to bounded depth propositional proofs in both relativized and non-relativized forms. We describe normal forms for proofs in bounded arithmetic, and a definition of Σ -depth for PK-proofs that makes the translation from bounded arithmetic to propositional logic particularly transparent. Using this, we give new proofs of the w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Ann. Pure Appl. Logic
دوره 136 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005